Coronavirus: Is it finally the time to unleash daring economic policy?
Sarayu Bacchu
Acknowledging the gravity of the economic damage ahead, policymakers
around the world have rightly ramped up efforts to stop their economies from
grinding to a halt. Responses must be balanced and take into account both the
short and long term effects, a difficult task when the future impact of the
virus remains uncertain.
In the short-run, the impacts will be substantial on both
the demand and supply side. Negative supply shocks will arise from illness,
workers self-isolating or government imposed lockdowns. On the demand side,
social distancing and lockdowns mean spending on the retail sector, social and
leisure activities is close to zero. Furthermore, as countries close down
borders, demand for flights and travel has already plummeted, with the tourism
industry being devastated.
The effects in the long run are still uncertain, and
consumer spending is likely to not rise immediately after lockdown eases. Whilst
some businesses will be able to bounce back, others will most likely never recover
fully. Some of the worst hit will be the travel and tourism industries,
especially cruises. Moreover, unless recent falls in the stock market bounce
back, future incomes will reduce and thus future spending will reduce, most
obviously when individuals reach retirement.
Whilst the key focus of economic policy response should be
to ensure continual delivery of public services and to minimise long term
effects, this is challenging to undertake, given that funds are scarce and long
term effects are not fully known.
Policymakers are unable to rely on tactics used in previous
recessions, as there are several factors distinguishing the current crisis -
the main one being the inability of consumers to spend as governments impose
shutdowns and lockdowns. Further, interest rates are already extremely low, and
further reductions would do little to boost spending in a time of lockdown. Instead,
fiscal policy measures must focus on supporting individuals who lose income,
maintaining public services and supporting affected businesses to ensure long
term impacts are kept to a minimum.
In his first budget, Rishi Sunak ended a decade of
austerity and ushered in a big increase in public spending with a £12 billion
emergency fiscal stimulus to counteract the shock of the COVID-19 outbreak. The
NHS has also received £5bn as part of an emergency response fund, and it has
been said it will receive as many “millions
or billions” as it needs to tackle the virus. In heavily hit sectors, like
hospitality and retail, business rates have been abolished for one year,
hopefully meaning firms will be able to survive through this period. In recent
weeks, another £60 billion has been added to public spending and £350 billion
for an emergency support package to businesses. Charities have also been hit
hard by this crisis, but the £750 million package announced on the 8th
of April offers a glimmer of hope.
As expected, borrowing forecasts have increased significantly from 1.8% of GDP (thought in March 2019) to 2.4% now. Isabel Stockton, a research economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies said, “A deficit of over £200bn in the coming financial year is well within the bounds of possibility”.
This is a huge figure, but ultimately, without these measures, economic and public finance costs would be a lot greater. The main aim of the government is to keep as many businesses and jobs afloat as possible, allowing normalcy to return as soon as possible after the crisis has passed, thus minimising long term impacts.
However, some critics have pointed out that UK hospitality will only receive half their wages from the government’s scheme, due to service chargers (normally 12-15% of the bill) not being included. This measure would directly affect tens of thousands of workers. Furthermore, studies have also shown that this economic crisis may impact women and low wage earners the most, which could further exacerbate existing inequalities.
This is a huge figure, but ultimately, without these measures, economic and public finance costs would be a lot greater. The main aim of the government is to keep as many businesses and jobs afloat as possible, allowing normalcy to return as soon as possible after the crisis has passed, thus minimising long term impacts.
However, some critics have pointed out that UK hospitality will only receive half their wages from the government’s scheme, due to service chargers (normally 12-15% of the bill) not being included. This measure would directly affect tens of thousands of workers. Furthermore, studies have also shown that this economic crisis may impact women and low wage earners the most, which could further exacerbate existing inequalities.
Nevertheless,
the UK has mobilised a huge financial response very quickly - hopefully it is
enough to keep firms surviving in these turbulent times.
Elsewhere in Europe, similar government spending has been
announced, such as Spain’s fiscal package totalling around €200 billion. Across
the Atlantic, the United States has agreed a historic $2 trillion stimulus deal
to fight the coronavirus fallout. This large fiscal boost to the US economy
cheered investors and gave markets some recovery after bruising losses in
previous days.
However, a poll for the FT revealed that
nearly three-quarters of Americans have seen their family’s income reduced.
Another sign of how widespread the pandemic’s economic impact has become is the
fact that almost as many families making more than $100,000 a year reported a
hit to their income than those making less than $50,000 a year. Of course, the
value of the reductions maybe different, and the same monetary loss would have
varying impacts across households with different incomes. Furthermore, the
graph below highlights this crisis impacting middle and low-skilled jobs
hardest, with the worrying fact that some jobs and sectors had not yet
recovered from the 2008 financial crisis, before being subject to another
economic crisis.
Moreover, as the pandemic continues to wreak havoc in the world’s
largest economy, with a record 6.6 million Americans filing for jobless aid
last week, a continued coherent and swift government response is necessary, if
the disruption is to be contained.
This pandemic has rapidly resulted in an economic crisis for
several major economies, resulting in the implementation of fiscal packages of
unprecedented sizes. As the COVID-19 outbreak continues to ravage on its path
of destruction, a broad and sustained program of bold fiscal policy is
necessary, to ensure the inevitable economic fallout is one we are able to
recover from.
Comments
Post a Comment